Skip to main content

THE POEMS OF MARTIN SEYMOUR-SMITH

Martin Seymour-Smith? If you haven't heard of him, then be afraid, and ashamed, for dear reader, you are him, one day. Run Press of Ireland has produced a lovely and thick book of all his poems, even the uncollected ones (which includes a very moving late poem to Robert Creeley). As usual, in this important series, the print is too small, but the printing and editorial quality is high.

MS-S (as I shall call him) was a friend of Robert Graves (another Robert) and an opponent of some elements of modernism.  Yet, he was a great editor, critic, when it came to literature, especially the foreign, which he also translated.  In the mid 1970s, in Britain, he would have been a well-known name among those whose reviews mattered.

Of course, like so many (all?) men (and women) of letters, whose main passion is poetry, life is hard, but death is crueler.  Oblivion awaits 99.9% of all poets, and their poems.  Who loves to read MS-S now? And yet, a few of his poems are very fine, such as 'Your Look' and some of the very early macabre poems of burnings, beggars festering in glass coffins, and tortured love.

An imaginative poet of high emotion, tempered by a curious love of the overwrought, rhetorically rococo sentence, his poems sometimes read like FT Prince's work as if it had been edited by a young Philip Larkin - so that you get both a 50s technical chill, but at times a curious Tasso-inflected extravagance.  In 'Mars in Scorpio" he writes:

I am my fate at last: almost becalmed, but
Heading, on this stern lacustrine mirror of your justice
Towards such intensities of cold that I've no choice
But between fear, and fear.

I love this - it resists the workshop ethos, and digs its heels in to diction, and style, and fustian stuff, and grabs poetry to sing thickly.

If you don't like elegant smart literary poems, that are fed fat like a goose for pate with allusions, formal craft, and a sense of the import of the poet's vocation, then you will be flustered and afraid.

MS-S, like Graves, believed in the calling of the poet, as a strange, noble and usually doomed affair between the divine forces and the bestial - and human sexual love was often like that too. These poems reference many torments of the pen, and the lover's pistol. I find this work exhilarating and sad.  Who reads this now, and if not, why not?

Because poetry is not what most people want, mostly.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".